Upcoming Events
The recent decision by the Congress to overturn the mandatory cyclist insurance introduced by the Zaragoza city council has sparked various opinions among users.
Many believe riding a bike should be as simple and accessible as going for a walk, without the added burden of mandatory insurance.
Supporters of the decision argue that it promotes cycling as a sustainable mode of transport and encourages more people to use bicycles for their daily commutes. They feel that imposing insurance requirements could deter potential cyclists and undermine efforts to promote eco-friendly transportation options.
On the other hand, some users express concerns about safety and accountability on the roads. They argue that having insurance could provide a safety net for both cyclists and motorists in case of accidents, fostering a more responsible cycling culture.
Overall, the debate reflects differing views on how to balance safety, accessibility, and the promotion of cycling in urban environments.
The issue of mandatory insurance for cycling in Zaragoza returned to public debate this Tuesday, but this time from Madrid. An amendment introduced by Jorge Pueyo, a deputy from CHA in Sumar Aragón, successfully included a provision exempting cyclists from having to purchase liability insurance. This decision effectively contradicts the Mobility ordinance approved a few months ago by the PP government in Zaragoza, with the support of Vox.
Several cycling groups challenged this agreement a few months ago in the Superior Court of Justice of Aragon (TSJA), which has yet to issue a ruling on the matter. However, once the new national law is ratified, it will take precedence and, in principle, nullify the mandatory insurance requirement introduced in Zaragoza. This decision has sparked a division of opinions among users in the Aragonese capital.